| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: security and journaling |
| From: | Scott McDermott <mcdermot@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:40:51 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <20020930153642.G24367@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from mcdermot@xxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 03:36:42PM -0400 |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <1033412016.12588.12.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020930185617.GA15397@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020930151013.F24367@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20020930191821.GO15322@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20020930153642.G24367@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
Cc linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx on Mon 30/09 15:36 -0400: > encrypted loopback is the way to go I guess. Unless root can't read > these files either, then use something like GPG. I guess root could read those too while it's in memory...oh well you are screwed if you can't trust root I guess. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: security and journaling, Scott McDermott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Status of XFS for 2.4.19 and GCC 3.2, Austin Gonyou |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: security and journaling, Scott McDermott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: security and journaling, Derek Glidden |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |