| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question about litte and Big Endian? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 25 Sep 2002 17:03:13 -0500 |
| Cc: | gmrincon@xxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, grincon@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1032990726.23748.555.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20020925205152.MZWD29048.mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net@mtiwebc19> <1032990726.23748.555.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
And if this all works, send in some benchmarks, to see if it's all worthwhile. :) -Eric On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 16:52, Steve Lord wrote: > you probably need to tweak that. There are a number of other places in > the xfs code which depend on the value of __BYTE_ORDER, you might try > changing that instead of doing what you did. > > Steve -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. 651-683-3102 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | slow performance with 2.4.19 and debian, Corey G. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: slow performance with 2.4.19 and debian, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Question about litte and Big Endian?, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question about litte and Big Endian?, Tim Shimmin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |