xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Clarification

from [Chris Wedgwood] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Clarification
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 17:54:36 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020921002754.GA17878@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3D8B03F4.497B7EE4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020920190749.GB10692@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3D8B75DC.1010305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020920194326.GB15065@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3D8B86BD.6050101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020920203850.GA15627@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020921002754.GA17878@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i 
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 02:27:54AM +0200, 
christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> sorry, but I'll need some clarification 'bout that. I just ran
> xfs_fsr on my server's data partitions, where all data is owned by
> non root, i.e. nis+ Users, and I didn't see any allocation
> errors. Would you please give any thougts about what I'm missing?

How old is your kernel?

> What I've just seen, xfs_fsr will run under the same userID as the
> file's owner...

Yes, and in recent kernels a minor security fix means only root and
preallocate space.




  --cw
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Clarification, christian . guggenberger
Next by Date:  Re: md + xfs (fwd), Simon Matter
Previous by Thread:  Re: Clarification, christian . guggenberger
Next by Thread:  Re: Clarification, christian . guggenberger
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]