| To: | mbest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linus merges XFS |
| From: | Michael Best <mbest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:34:59 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20020917000532.A18289@xxxxxxxxxx> <20020917072301.C81FF69123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3D8723BE.8050702@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3D87944B.8040206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2a) Gecko/20020910 |
Yes, the xfs-sources are using the 2.4.19 kernel tree. The gentoo-sources-2.4.19-r7 contains the older xfs 1.1 code, the new proposed gentoo-sources-2.4.19-r9 does not contain xfs at all. But based on comments I've read, it probably better for XFS to not be included and force people to use the xfs-sources tree. -Mike Harald Wagener wrote: > did You do an emerge -s xfs? I know that a few day ago, xfs-sources > still popped up. > > Regards, > Harald |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linus merges XFS, Harald Wagener |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS mount failure, vkuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linus merges XFS, Harald Wagener |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linus merges XFS, Ethan Benson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |