| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: raid1 (u)mount error |
| From: | thomas <tom@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:32:51 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <20020910192023.GA5470@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <527280437.20020910155814@xxxxxxxx> <20020910182241.GA5230@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1031682497.22845.97.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020910184228.GA5323@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1031683668.22845.102.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020910185723.GA5375@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1298234671.20020910211407@xxxxxxxx> <20020910192023.GA5470@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | thomas <tom@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>> nope / is reiserfs.
> and this is /dev/md0 for you? or something else?
sorry, i guess i wasn't clear enough in my first post :)
situation is like this:
+[~]: df -Th
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 reiserfs 2.2G 430M 1.8G 20% /
/dev/hdc1 reiserfs 2.2G 1.6G 634M 72% /var
/dev/md0 xfs 75G 69G 5.9G 93% /data
+[~]: cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
read_ahead 1024 sectors
md0 : active raid1 hdc5[0] hda5[1]
78123904 blocks [2/2] [UU]
all the stuff that i thought might be also responsible for this
(sysvinit, mount, raidttols, ...) is already upgraded to latest version.
now if there is a chance that cvs *might* help here i'm on my way to
grab it. can i patch cvs with 2.4.19 or do i have to get 2.4.20-pre5?
thomas
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4.20pre5aa2, Andrea Arcangeli |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.20pre5aa2, Stephen Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: raid1 (u)mount error, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: raid1 (u)mount error, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |