Re: raid1 (u)mount error

[Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:28:17PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:

> Are you doing this with current cvs code?

I saw this about two weeks ago, whatever was current then.

From the call path, XFS was only responsible for the second open
though, might this still be the problem?

> The xfs log used to effectively open the device again. I think this
> has been reworked in the current code to avoid the double open.

> I have not checked into this, so I might be wrong.

I can, if you like, retest fairly easily with the head of the tree.
Note, I'm talking about 2.4.x here in both messages.



  --cw