I think that if you author a document from publicly available information,
you can put it under any license you'd like. Although I'm not a lawyer...
If you take the design documents (which are still incorrectly marked
"confidential") and cut and paste from them, then that probably
raises different issues. Although I am not a lawyer. :)
-Eric
On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, David Lloyd wrote:
>
> Eric,
>
> Would SGI have a problem if the document was auspiced under The Linux
> Documentation Project?
>
> This would have the effect of throwing it to a wider audience, a peer
> review system some of whom have no idea what I'm talking about (always a
> good thing -- this is a tutorial, so the only thing I'd assume is that
> the person knows a little about working with the Linux Kernel source
> code and file system concepts)...
>
> Would SGI mind if the document were under the GNU Document Licence? (I
> forget the correct acronym)
>
> DSL
> --
> Con te partiro, su navi per mari
> Che io lo so, no, no non esistono piu
> Con te io li vivro.
> (Sartori F, Quarantotto E)
>
|