xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS bad block recording?

To: Michael Best <mbest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS bad block recording?
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 00:02:32 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3D76F3E9.5090808@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <H00000a1000da880.1031164571.pobox@MHS> <1031165125.3056.18.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020905035940.GC6004@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3D76F3E9.5090808@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:04:25AM -0600, Michael Best wrote:

> Basically even with ext2/ext3, with the drive failing spectacularly,
> it's pretty much game over for that drive.

For gradual failures or "bad blocks in stasis" it would be nice to
have the fs avoid these.

> EVMS and LVM may have addressed this issue where the LVM/EVMS layer
> is actually handling the physical disks and can reallocate bad
> blocks on the fly.

Arguably, you shouldn't need to use LVM to deal with bad blocks.

Anyhow, this is getting rather OT.  If XFS cannot deal with bad-blocks
(I'm not talking about failing drives), then that is that and other
means are required.



  --cw


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>