Re: [PATCH] Kernel janitor cleanup

xfs

Re: [PATCH] Kernel janitor cleanup

To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Kernel janitor cleanup
From:	Brian Pontz <brian.pontz@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 03 Sep 2002 09:41:59 -0400
Cc:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References:	<3D74023E.1010208@xxxxxxxx> <20020903095458.A551@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3



The return cleanups make sense, that was inconsisten even inside XFS.
I'm not entirely sure wheter the int->uint stuff makes sense.  Have
you seen differences in the generated assembly?

I'll leave out the int->uint stuff for now. If it's proved correct inthe future, then I'll do it at thattime. So you can disregard the previous patch and I'll make a new onewithout the int->uint changes

in it. The return changes are easy to do with a script.

Brian

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] Kernel janitor cleanup, Brian Pontz Re: [PATCH] Kernel janitor cleanup, Keith Owens Re: [PATCH] Kernel janitor cleanup, Brian Pontz Re: [PATCH] Kernel janitor cleanup, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH] Kernel janitor cleanup, Brian Pontz <= Re: [PATCH] Kernel janitor cleanup, Brian Pontz Re: [PATCH] Kernel janitor cleanup, Brian Pontz

Previous by Date:	How can I become a part of XFS development team, Saji Kumar VR
Next by Date:	re[2]: snapshot regression test try 3, Greg Freemyer
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] Kernel janitor cleanup, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] Kernel janitor cleanup, Brian Pontz
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]