| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patch to give kmalloc a chance (RFC) |
| From: | Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:06:57 -0300 (BRT) |
| Cc: | Ravi Wijayaratne <ravi_wija@xxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1033163688.10533.79.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 27 Sep 2002, Steve Lord wrote: > I am picturing Rik with shivers going down his spine right now ;-) Yup ... ;) > The better way to deal with this is either to have a small pool > of these structures we can fall back on, or even to fail the I/O. > The latter will shutdown the filesystem though. Look at the stuff in mm/mempool.c It might be just what you need. Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Spamtraps of the month: september@xxxxxxxxxxx trac@xxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: patch to give kmalloc a chance (RFC), Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patch to give kmalloc a chance (RFC), Andrew Morton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patch to give kmalloc a chance (RFC), Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patch to give kmalloc a chance (RFC), Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |