[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Clarification

To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Clarification
From: christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 02:27:54 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020920203850.GA15627@tapu.f00f.org>
References: <3D8B03F4.497B7EE4@tataelxsi.co.in> <20020920190749.GB10692@tapu.f00f.org> <3D8B75DC.1010305@koschikode.com> <20020920194326.GB15065@tapu.f00f.org> <3D8B86BD.6050101@koschikode.com> <20020920203850.GA15627@tapu.f00f.org>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 01:38:50PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 10:36:13PM +0200, Juri Haberland wrote:
> > Uhm, do I understand you right that xfs_fsr cannot defragment - say
> > /home/* ?
> Yes, with the current xfs_fsr and kernel from CVS, it won't work.
> "xfs_fsr -v -d" will sho allocation failures for non-root owned files.

sorry, but I'll need some clarification 'bout that. I just ran xfs_fsr on my 
server's data partitions, where all data is owned by non root, i.e. nis+ Users, 
and I didn't see any allocation errors. Would you please give any thougts about 
what I'm missing?
What I've just seen, xfs_fsr will run under the same userID as the file's 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>