| To: | Michael Best <mbest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linus merges XFS |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:23:09 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3D872A57.5040301@emergence.com>; from mbest@emergence.com on Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 07:12:55AM -0600 |
| References: | <20020917000532.A18289@s2y4n2c.de> <20020917072301.C81FF69123@xxl.bi.corp.invoca.ch> <3D8723BE.8050702@emergence.com> <20020917135954.A25165@infradead.org> <3D872A57.5040301@emergence.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 07:12:55AM -0600, Michael Best wrote: > Just curious which of their patches/patch combinations were the worst? older xfs + preempt was very bad, merging of wli's unreleases per-zone kswapd + rmap + radix tree code was also very bad. Just look at some of the kernel patches, they're often random patch collections. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linus merges XFS, Seth Mos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.4.18 kernel oops (RH7.3-SGI-XFS-1.1), Regos Bendeguz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linus merges XFS, Michael Best |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linus merges XFS, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |