xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: raid1 (u)mount error

To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: raid1 (u)mount error
From: thomas <tom@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:32:51 +0200
In-reply-to: <20020910192023.GA5470@tapu.f00f.org>
References: <527280437.20020910155814@huno.net> <20020910182241.GA5230@tapu.f00f.org> <1031682497.22845.97.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <20020910184228.GA5323@tapu.f00f.org> <1031683668.22845.102.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <20020910185723.GA5375@tapu.f00f.org> <1298234671.20020910211407@huno.net> <20020910192023.GA5470@tapu.f00f.org>
Reply-to: thomas <tom@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> nope / is reiserfs.

> and this is /dev/md0 for you? or something else?

sorry, i guess i wasn't clear enough in my first post :)
situation is like this:

+[~]: df -Th
Filesystem    Type    Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 reiserfs    2.2G  430M  1.8G  20% /
/dev/hdc1 reiserfs    2.2G  1.6G  634M  72% /var
/dev/md0       xfs     75G   69G  5.9G  93% /data

+[~]: cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
read_ahead 1024 sectors
md0 : active raid1 hdc5[0] hda5[1]
      78123904 blocks [2/2] [UU]

all the stuff that i thought might be also responsible for this
(sysvinit, mount, raidttols, ...) is already upgraded to latest version.

now if there is a chance that cvs *might* help here i'm on my way to
grab it. can i patch cvs with 2.4.19 or do i have to get 2.4.20-pre5?

thomas


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>