xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OT: virus] Re: SELECTED

To: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OT: virus] Re: SELECTED
From: "Blizbor (IMA)" <tb670725@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 22:18:53 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200208281053.MAA18676@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3D6D04B1.5050508@xxxxxxxxx> <3D6D2A0C.3040802@xxxxxx> <20020828115941.E17654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
Ethan,

 From my point of view - it can be any tool which will efectively
remove infected messages. Let it be spamassasin. I dont want to start
another "holy war".


Ethan Benson wrote:

> before the cease of use of spamassassin on this list almost none of
> these ever made it, clearly that solution worked fine, it just needs
> to be reenstated.  i would also prefer not having the list spammed
> with `that message is a virus!!! update windows with our proprietary
> virus scanner today!' messages in place of the virus itself. (that
> seems to be what those things always do).

It seems, but is not. That things are almost always configured
such a way for users convenience. However antivirus scaner could
be configured to do his work silently.

I dont think so here is a place to discuss that any longer.

Regards,
Blizbor


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>