xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Hacking XFS (was Re: reserve space for root?)

To: James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hacking XFS (was Re: reserve space for root?)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:52:24 +0100
Cc: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208271640040.2790-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:47:26PM -0600
References: <20020823211050.A27629@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208271640040.2790-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:47:26PM -0600, James Rich wrote:
> > I think XFS would really need someone to maintain the website.  It's
> > horribly out of date, and misses some important links.  For example
> > it would be nice to have a link to my XFS merge status or even a htmlized
> > version.  I don't know whether externals are allowed to work on oss.sgi.com,
> > though..
> 
> Okay, I've been thinking about what I can do and have come up with
> something along these lines.  The mozilla project has a status report
> which is basically a weekly summary of what people have done.  This is
> different than the merge status report, which is a more overview of what
> has been done and what lies ahead.  I propose to do a (possibly weekly or
> more often) summary of the TAKE messages so that people know what has been
> fixed in CVS, similar to the mozilla project's weekly status report.
> 
> I've put together a very quick example of what I plan to do at:
> 
> http://www.chowhouse.com/~james/xfs/checklist.html
> 
> it covers the two checkins today (oops - Steve just checked in a third).
> Tell me if you think this is a good thing or a waste of time.

I think it looks very nice.  Now if only we could get this onto oss.sgi.com..


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>