| To: | Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Detected potential for stack overflows, stack left: 796 bytes |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:39:12 +0100 |
| Cc: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Jim Eshleman <jce0@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020827162129.GG21566@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from andrea@xxxxxxx on Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:21:29PM +0200 |
| References: | <3D652F1A.3080005@xxxxxxxxxx> <1030041582.10311.105.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020822194611.A28364@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020827162129.GG21566@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:21:29PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > Well, just looking at the function names in that stack, it looks like > > > the xfs in the aa kernel is somewhat dated. We did a bunch of work > > > since then to reduce stack usage in XFS. > > > > It's XFS 1.1, the last official release.. > > > > Andrea, would you be interested in more uptodate XFS code for -aa? > > yes, that would be welcome ;) Once the next -aa release is out to resync I'll make a patch. |
| Previous by Date: | re[2]: Snapshot regression test [WAS: re[6]: Summary - Snapshot Effort], Greg Freemyer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS on Redhat 7.2, Mike |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Detected potential for stack overflows, stack left: 796 bytes, Andrea Arcangeli |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Detected potential for stack overflows, stack left: 796 bytes, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |