| To: | Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Redhat Advanced Server and XFS? |
| From: | Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:07:41 +0200 |
| >received: | from tempmail.sauter-bc.com (tempmail [10.1.6.25]) by zuerich.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93DD138010; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:07:42 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | "Linux XFS (SGI)" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Sauter AG, Basel |
| References: | <1029956246.6672.47.camel@locutus> <3D648757.5791634E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1030398530.23678.71.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Florin Andrei schrieb: > > On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 23:40, Simon Matter wrote: > > > > Seems RedHat just doesn't want us to use XFS. That's why it is so > > important that XFS goes into the official kernel. Then they can't refuse > > it anymore :) > > Oh yes, they can. See ReiserFS. ;-) ReiserFS is not officially available at install time and they compiled it with CHECK_REISERFS=yes in the past. On the other hand it is included and can be used. The same happened with JFS. So, if XFS is in the standard kernel, they won't refuse compiling it in. Simon > > -- > Florin Andrei > > "If you think technology can solve your security problems, > then you don't understand the problems > and you don't understand the technology." - Bruce Schneier |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: hanging when mounting, success, johncoltrane39 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Locking problems, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Redhat Advanced Server and XFS?, Bill Anderson |
| Next by Thread: | re[2]: Redhat Advanced Server and XFS?, Greg Freemyer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |