At 09:43 26-8-2002 +0200, johncoltrane39@xxxxxx wrote:
>I also decided to update to the recent xfsprogs 2.0.3 from the ftp server
>this evening and to give xfs_repair a try. I cannot imagine what has happened
>to the xfs partitions, in my view it seems related to the update to the
>2.4.19, but going back to the painless 2.4.16 didn't help. In the moment I
>the FAQ that gcc 2.95-2 should not be used, may be I should update to 2.95-3,
>what's recommended in the FAQ
Drop 2.95.2 and get 2.95.3 or later. 2.95.2 is known to miscompile some
code (in the past). Since 2.95.3 is publicly available and a bugfix release
that one should be used instead.
>Any further suggestions ?
Capture the output from an xfs_repair if you can.
It might just be your lucky day, if you only knew.