xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: re[4]: Redhat Advanced Server and XFS?

To: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: re[4]: Redhat Advanced Server and XFS?
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 22 Aug 2002 15:57:14 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bill Anderson <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20020822205226.PQRG10702.imf26bis.bellsouth.net@TAZ2>
Organization: Coremetrics, Inc.
References: <20020822205226.PQRG10702.imf26bis.bellsouth.net@TAZ2>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 15:51, Greg Freemyer wrote:
>  >>  On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 12:55:13PM -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
>  >>  > Per the interview at
>  >>  http://ocfs.otncast.otnxchange.oracle.com/source/browse/ocfs/
>  >>  >  Oracle has added a lot of Enterprise quality tweaks to the AS
> kernel. 
>  >>  (I think many of these are now in 2.4.19, but I'm not sure.)
> 
>  >>  "Enterprise quality tweaks" is exactly the right term.  Meaning
> they made
>  >>  Ingo code up some crude hacks to win benchmarks. (and some useful
> stuff
>  >>  like the O(1) scheduler).

Precisely why I say use the -AA tree. I've yet to have any unexpected
"odd" problems from it on dual and quad proc boxes.


> Greg Freemyer
> Internet Engineer
> Deployment and Integration Specialist
> Compaq ASE - Tru64 v4, v5
> Compaq Master ASE - SAN Architect
> The Norcross Group
www.NorcrossGroup.com
-- 
Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Coremetrics, Inc.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>