xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Redhat Advanced Server and XFS?

To: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Redhat Advanced Server and XFS?
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:40:44 +0100
Cc: Bill Anderson <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Linux XFS (SGI)" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3D648757.5791634E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:40:23AM +0200
References: <1029956246.6672.47.camel@locutus> <3D648757.5791634E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:40:23AM +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
> Seems RedHat just doesn't want us to use XFS. That's why it is so
> important that XFS goes into the official kernel. Then they can't refuse
> it anymore :)
> 
> AFAIK RH AS uses a quite old but heavy patched kernel. It may be
> difficult to backport current XFS patches. You may have some luck trying
> the patches from the 2.4.9-34 source RPM as a starting point.

Although the AS server calls itself 2.4.9 it is quite different from
RedHat's 2.4.9-34 (which already has more in common with the last 2.4.13-ac
then any released 2.4.9 kernel..).  This does include filesystem-related
changes such as AIO to which XFS is not adoptable without major effort.

The simplest solution would to just take the 2.4.9-34 rpm which should
install fine in AS and use that with XFS.  Alternatively I'm happy to
contract with you in October to fit XFS into the AS kernel 8)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>