xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Updated XFS merge status

To: "Stephen Lord" <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Updated XFS merge status
From: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:53:32 +0200
Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1030009190.1839.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002 04:39:47 -0500, Stephen Lord wrote:

>On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 04:30, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:18:06 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> 
>> >Other changes in the XFS tree              2.4     2.4-ac   2.5
>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------­
>> >KDB                                        - (7)   - (7)  - (7)
>> [...]
>> >(7) Not likely to go in ever. (political reasons)
>> 
>> What are these "political reasons?"
>
>Linus does not believe in debuggers, lots of other people do,
>but not Linus. Search an archive of the kernel mailing list
>for the details on this.

I see.

Well, I have certain strong feelings about this (I do respect Linus for what he 
did), but I don't utter them publicly because I probably WOULD provoke a 
flamewar if I did.

Thanks for the info.


-- 
Sign the EU petition against SPAM:          L I N U X       .~.
http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/        The  Choice      /V\
                                            of a  GNU      /( )\
                                           Generation      ^^-^^




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>