| To: | Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: re[2]: JFS is going into 2.4? What about XFS in 2.5.? |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Aug 2002 20:05:10 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020820190206.ZBKI515.imf11bis.bellsouth.net@TAZ2>; from freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 02:59:18PM -0400 |
| References: | <20020820190206.ZBKI515.imf11bis.bellsouth.net@TAZ2> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 02:59:18PM -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote: > Does that mean for 2.5 once the mark_page_accessed and PG_TRANS issues are > resolved, the whole XFS filesystem is ready to go in with _no_ more massaging? > > Or does it mean that those 2 have to go in plus a lot of other massaging to > the XFS filesystem code before it gets officially incorporated? The XFS core still needs a number of cleanups/simplifications. Whether they have to be done before merhing into 2.5 mainline or after isn't decided yet. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | re[2]: JFS is going into 2.4? What about XFS in 2.5.?, Greg Freemyer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - fix an xfs memory deadlock case, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | re[2]: JFS is going into 2.4? What about XFS in 2.5.?, Greg Freemyer |
| Next by Thread: | re[2]: [Newbie VFS-lock question, Greg Freemyer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |