| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and net devices, any pros or cons ? |
| From: | "Blizbor (IMA)" <tb670725@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Aug 2002 12:16:34 +0200 |
| References: | <20020814171123.FZMF1197.imf05bis.bellsouth.net@TAZ2> <1029345349.15708.98.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3D5B5696.3FDFD3B6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 |
Simon Matter wrote: If I'm not completely wrong here drbd is similar to nbd, isn't it. Long time ago I have successfully built a software RAID5 over three server using nbd, of course running XFS as filesystem. How many crashes it was survived ? (Probably you were crashing them for tests, arent so ?) Regards, Blizbor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: kernel BUG at filemap.c:843!, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: umount in XFS is broken, Stephen Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS and net devices, any pros or cons ?, Simon Matter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS and net devices, any pros or cons ?, Simon Matter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |