xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Are there mmap problems with xfs 2.4.17?

To: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Are there mmap problems with xfs 2.4.17?
From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:15:27 -0800
In-reply-to: <15708.22618.786062.458402@xxxxxxxxx>; from jasonw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 11:41:46AM +1000
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <15708.22618.786062.458402@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 11:41:46AM +1000, Jason White wrote:
> I am experiencing occasional and unpredictable "memory fault" errors
> with Berkeley DB 4.0.14 (I am testing Subversion:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/).
> 
> On the Subversion mailing list it was suggested that if there are mmap
> problems with XFS, these might be the cause of the crashes, which seem
> to be due to Berkeley DB rather than the Subversion software itself.
> 
> The kernel I am running is:
> Linux jdc 2.4.17-xfs #1 Sat Jan 19 16:47:16 EST 2002 i686
> (checked out from cvs on that date).
> 
> Any suggestions?

yes 2.4.17 with XFS is broken.

> I am willing to upgrade my kernel, but thought it best to inquire on
> the list first to find out whether this is likely to be XFS-related,
> if so whether it has been fixed and whether I can help to track it
> down.
> 
> I am also waiting for 2.4.19-xfs to stabilize before upgrading; as I
> remember, there were bugs that Steve Lord and others were working on.
> 
> There was some discussion of mmap problems recently, but that was only
> on power-pc - wasn't it?

no it was all archietectures, apt-get would segfault because its
binary caches became corrupt (this was due to msync() being broken in
that kernel).

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgpzCZ65eznAI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>