xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Problem repairing filesystem

To: Luciano Chavez <lnx1138@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Problem repairing filesystem
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 14 Aug 2002 11:04:46 -0500
Cc: XFS mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1029340818.2690.21.camel@chavez>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020814140949.03bba840@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3D5A5D5D.AEE17BD8@xxxxxxxx> <3D5A736B.99998201@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1029339359.18361.36.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1029340818.2690.21.camel@chavez>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 11:00, Luciano Chavez wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 10:35, Steve Lord wrote:
> 
> > So have any of you folks tried V2 logs with striping on a software raid,
> > it should fix the performance there.
> 
> Steve,
> 
> Just out of curiosity, is the reason that a mkfs.xfs with the latest
> xfsprogs that supports V2 logs doesn't get set to version 2 when stripe
> info is detected due to backward compatibility? That is, if you have
> either MD or LVM striping or EVMS, the log version still defaults to 1.
> 
> I seem to remember a discussion at one time that mkfs would default to
> version 2 if stripe info was detected or a sunit and swidth given.

The version I have will default to version 2 if -l sunit=xxx is on the
command line, not sure if it will do it if the device itself returns
a stripe unit. Will have to check on that.

Steve

> 
> -- 
> regards,
> 
> Luciano Chavez
> 
> lnx1138@xxxxxxxxxx          
> http://evms.sourceforge.net
-- 

Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>