| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Problem repairing filesystem |
| From: | Luciano Chavez <lnx1138@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 14 Aug 2002 11:00:17 -0500 |
| Cc: | XFS mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1029339359.18361.36.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20020814140949.03bba840@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3D5A5D5D.AEE17BD8@xxxxxxxx> <3D5A736B.99998201@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1029339359.18361.36.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 10:35, Steve Lord wrote: > So have any of you folks tried V2 logs with striping on a software raid, > it should fix the performance there. Steve, Just out of curiosity, is the reason that a mkfs.xfs with the latest xfsprogs that supports V2 logs doesn't get set to version 2 when stripe info is detected due to backward compatibility? That is, if you have either MD or LVM striping or EVMS, the log version still defaults to 1. I seem to remember a discussion at one time that mkfs would default to version 2 if stripe info was detected or a sunit and swidth given. -- regards, Luciano Chavez lnx1138@xxxxxxxxxx http://evms.sourceforge.net |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problem repairing filesystem, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Problem repairing filesystem, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Problem repairing filesystem, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Problem repairing filesystem, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |