xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

TAKE - MS_POSIXACL

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: TAKE - MS_POSIXACL
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:45:09 +1000 (EST)
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:  Sun Aug 11 20:42:18 PDT 2002
Workarea:  snort.melbourne.sgi.com:/home/nathans/2.4.x-xfs

The following file(s) were checked into:
  bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs


Modid:  2.4.x-xfs:slinx:124779a
linux/include/linux/fs.h - 1.157
linux/fs/xfs/xfs_acl.h - 1.21
linux/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_vnode.c - 1.91
linux/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_super.c - 1.204
        - Switch to using a superblock flag (MS_POSIXACL) instead of an inode
          flag (S_POSIXACL) - seems to be the consensus on how to do this.

linux/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_iops.c - 1.169
        - Fix a now-incorrect comment.

linux/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_vnode.h - 1.58
        - Fix debug builds - VINACTIVE_TEARDOWN no longer exists.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • TAKE - MS_POSIXACL, Nathan Scott <=