| Subject: | Re: rpm bookkeeping |
|---|---|
| From: | "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 04 Aug 2002 14:41:17 -0600 |
| Cc: | "XFS: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3D4C8776.3050700@xxxxxxxxxx> <3D4D0F91.4070404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | stimits@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020528 |
Juri Haberland wrote: D. Stimits wrote:I just did a cvs update to 2.4.19, from 2.4.19-rc2. Apparently the cmd rpms are the same version, without any changes. Even so, I did a make cmd and ran "rpm -Uvh *" on the i386 subdirectory, most simply said theFWIW: better use 'rpm -Fhv *.rpm'. '-U' would install every rpm that is currently not installed or older. '-F' just updates currently installed rpms if newer versions are available. Cheers, Juri If there was a new rpm, I wanted it installed, so the -U was ok in this case. I do use -F when I only want update if previously present. D. Stimits, stimits AT idcomm.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: problem with filemap.c bug at 247, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.19 with split patches fails to build quota on powerpc, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: rpm bookkeeping, Juri Haberland |
| Next by Thread: | problem with filemap.c bug at 247, Knut J Bjuland |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |