Re: rpm bookkeeping

xfs

Re: rpm bookkeeping

To:	"XFS: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: rpm bookkeeping
From:	Juri Haberland <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 04 Aug 2002 13:27:13 +0200
Organization:	totally unorganized
References:	<3D4C8776.3050700@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510

D. Stimits wrote:
> I just did a cvs update to 2.4.19, from 2.4.19-rc2. Apparently the cmd 
> rpms are the same version, without any changes. Even so, I did a make 
> cmd and ran "rpm -Uvh *" on the i386 subdirectory, most simply said the 

FWIW: better use 'rpm -Fhv *.rpm'.
'-U' would install every rpm that is currently not installed or older.
'-F' just updates currently installed rpms if newer versions are available.

Cheers,
Juri

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
rpm bookkeeping, D. Stimits Re: rpm bookkeeping, Juri Haberland <= Re: rpm bookkeeping, D. Stimits

Previous by Date:	Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync, Seth Mos
Next by Date:	problem with filemap.c bug at 247, Knut J Bjuland
Previous by Thread:	rpm bookkeeping, D. Stimits
Next by Thread:	Re: rpm bookkeeping, D. Stimits
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]