[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The mmap() problem is back

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: The mmap() problem is back
From: Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 18:59:41 +0200
In-reply-to: <1028391174.1131.8.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20020803132927.GA576@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <9862.1028384103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020803142405.GC576@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1028390577.1131.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020803160859.GE576@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1028391174.1131.8.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On 2002-08-03 11:12:52-0500, Stephen Lord wrote:
> > It says "1 files fixed". That means it found a problem :)
> > 
> > > > % mapcheck foo
> > > > 1 files scanned 0 files fixed 0 errors
> > 
> > Now it is already fixed, and finds no error.
> You are right of course, shows what an hour or so on a lawnmower does
> for my brain! Does not exhibit the problem on a couple of machines
> here. You are really running the kernel you think you are, aren't 
> you?

Linux thunk 2.4.19-xfs #1 Sat Aug 3 12:52:09 CEST 2002 i586 unknown unknown 

As I said in my other mail, it takes some trying to get it to produce the
error. If I create different files with different sizes in different ways
the problem *will* get triggered. I can reproduce it on two machines, one
running 2.4.19-xfs (p200mmx, SCSI) and one 2.4.19-rc2-xfs (Athlon XP, IDE).

Also of note may be that I'm running it with the ngpt futex patch and the
O(1) scheduler patch.


Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Change in Earth's rotational speed

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>