xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OT: virus] Re: SELECTED

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OT: virus] Re: SELECTED
From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:59:41 -0800
In-reply-to: <3D6D2A0C.3040802@ima.pl>; from tb670725@ima.pl on Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:52:44PM +0200
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200208281053.MAA18676@ady.hdsnet.hu> <3D6D04B1.5050508@attbi.com> <3D6D2A0C.3040802@ima.pl>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:52:44PM +0200, Blizbor (IMA) wrote:
> 
> IMVHO: most of that could be avoided using procmail sanitizer.
> It can do enough sanity checks to remove most of existing
> mail viruses.
> 
> All I can do to help - I can setup mail routing on my mail servers
> so each incoming message will be routed back to linux-xfs list
> server after virus checking using professional antyvirus software.
> If somebody who is responsible for this list is interrested, please 
> contact me.

before the cease of use of spamassassin on this list almost none of
these ever made it, clearly that solution worked fine, it just needs
to be reenstated.  i would also prefer not having the list spammed
with `that message is a virus!!! update windows with our proprietary
virus scanner today!' messages in place of the virus itself. (that
seems to be what those things always do).

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj1tK60ACgkQJKx7GixEevzLXQCfdiUAHwbxk/3G0zZjhgFn5kcJ
AfYAnjr/Pg76poDqB6dqQwH5QaNU5YYK
=irhE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>