Re: Detected potential for stack overflows, stack left: 796 bytes

[Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:46:02PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Hi Jim - 
> 
> Hm, was just talking about this with Christoph.  :)
> 
> XFS does use a bit of stack, but the code in XFS 1.1 (which is, I think,
> also in your -aa kernel) is probably much worse than what is currently
> in CVS.  We're aware of the issue, and now apparently this same
> stack-check code is in the 2.4.20-preX kernels - so we'll keep an eye on
> it.  As far as your current situation... I guess maybe we'll have to
> talk to Andrea about it, I don't know what he'll want to do about
> updating XFS code in his tree.

He's waiting for XFS 1.2 for the next update.

-Andi