[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Conflicting Types Between .h and .c files

To: Danny Cox <DCox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Conflicting Types Between .h and .c files
From: mdew <mdew@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 21 Aug 2002 00:37:40 +1200
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1029787095.8619.53.camel@wiley>
References: <1029504550.1808.5.camel@wiley> <20020819194735.A32101@infradead.org> <1029783129.1147.37.camel@wiley> <20020819195641.A32415@infradead.org> <1029784293.1147.49.camel@wiley> <20020819204345.A1068@infradead.org> <1029787095.8619.53.camel@wiley>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 07:58, Danny Cox wrote:
> Christoph,
> On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 15:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > But it does work with redhat's latest release compilers (7.1/7.2 errata, 
> > 7.3).
> > So please upgrade to those, older compilers are known to produce buggy code
> > in combination with XFS anyway.
>       From my system, "rpm -qa | grep gcc" produces:
> gcc-2.96-108.7.2
> granted, Eric says his is gcc-2.96-110.*, but I'm as uptodate as I know
> how to be.

whats stopping you installing gcc 3.1.1 ? (or if you're keen 3.2) 

Linux mdew 2.4.19-xfs-rmap13c-preemptive #2 Sat Aug 10 02:18:14 NZST
2002 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
GPG Key: http://mdew.orcon.net.nz/gpg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>