xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Kernel BUG at page_alloc.c:91 (2.4.19-rc2-xfs)

To: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Kernel BUG at page_alloc.c:91 (2.4.19-rc2-xfs)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 10:59:17 +0100
Cc: Linux-XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20020728082542.GC1265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from jijo@xxxxxxxxxxx on Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 04:25:42PM +0800
Mail-followup-to: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20020728082542.GC1265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 04:25:42PM +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I apologize for sending this to both the Linux kernel mailing list as
> well as the Linux-XFS mailing list. I am sending this to the lkml
> because it's a kernel bug report. I'm sending this to the Linux-XFS
> mailing list because I do not know if "try_to_free_buffers+130/240" in
> the Call Trace has anything to do with changes that the XFS team has
> done on the Linux kernel.

Let me guess: you're using nvidia's binary only module?  if so please go
and complain to them, this oops is characteristic for their buggy driver.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>