xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: logdev on IDE

To: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: logdev on IDE
From: Keith Matthews <keith_m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 17:22:00 +0100
In-reply-to: <20020727152441.GA9977@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1027535026.1648.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1027535678.14036.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1027539660.1648.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020727152441.GA9977@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 11:24:43 -0400
"Charles Shannon Hendrix" <shannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> Some IDE drives lie about things like write-cache and the ordering of
> writes.  For example, you can issue the command to turn write-cache
> off, but it doesn't really happen.
> 
> Likewise, an IDE drive may report it has written a block of data, but
> it hasn't, meaning you can't garantee write ordering.
> 
> I wish hard drive reviews would include information like this.  I have
> heard that things like the IBM Ultrastar and Seagate Barracuda are
> fully compliant with all commands, but have never tried to test the
> theory.
> 

I understand that this was through a hole in the ATA spec that was
closed about 6 months ago. I have no idea if there are any drives to the
old spec still in the supply chain, but those currently being
manufactured are probably OK.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>