[Top] [All Lists]


To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: NFS
From: Skylar Thompson <skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 20:57:09 -0500
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207231138300.17152-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: League of Morgoth
References: <20020723145840.GB2018@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207231138300.17152-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Skylar Thompson <skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Smtp-mailing-host: smtp1.thompson.us
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 11:41:05AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Hi Skylar - 
> NFS + Linux XFS is quite useable in general - we've chased down several
> problems over the past few months.  There are some outstanding issues,
> but those generally show up under very high stress.

OK. I'm not planning anything really big; I'll be storing about 40GB of
data, and serving about 3GB of that over Samba and NFS.
> The only real answer, of course, is to test it in your environment,
> but I expect that it will work well for you.

OK. I'll report back on the results once I finish the transition tonight.

-- Skylar Thompson (skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)

Attachment: pgpVaVUkDLVrW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>