At 13:20 17-7-2002 -0500, Ben Gollmer wrote:
Hi storage gurus!
This server is going to handle file sharing, e-mail, CVS, and a bug-tracking
database for us. Our project has some rather large files so we need a good
amount of storage space. I was planning to software RAID 5 the HDDs together
for a total of 160 GBs. I have been enjoying XFS on my workstation but I
know it has had problems with software RAID 5 in the past. Are these
problems fixed now?
The only problems XFS had/has with raid5 are performance issues. They are
not really problems in the sense that they break stuff. And performance
fixes still occur every once in a while.
The real performance fix for raid5 is still in the works, untill that one
is submitted everything still works and you can use it. I do it, I have a
software raid5 with a internal log and I still don't consider it extremely
slow in the sence that it is not usable. And the good thing is that it will
only get faster in the future.
We also considered trying to grab another 80 GB drive from somewhere and do
a RAID 0+1 (still giving us 160 GBs storage) but I don't know if Linux
software RAID handles this well.
This works just fine. I already built one for testing and it performed and
worked well. Just create 2 raid 1 devices and stripe those 2 raid 0 devices
together.
So something like this:
md0 = hda + hdb
md1 = hdc + hdd
md2 = md0 + md1
Most of us run the -aa kernel tree on our workstations but I have no problem
running SGI CVS kernels on the server if they are reasonably stable. Any
input would be much appreciated :)
I am running the current CVS on some test machines but not on a production
box yet. We decided to replace the broadcom gigabit cards(for intel e1000
cards) so we don't need the tg3 driver from 2.4.19 anymore.
Cheers
--
Seth
It might just be your lucky day, if you only knew.
|