| To: | Mike Baptiste <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS 1.1 and pre-emptible kernel??? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 15 Jul 2002 15:34:11 -0500 |
| Cc: | rjmx@xxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3D3330C8.7050608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <87it3hhs1o.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3D3330C8.7050608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 15:30, Mike Baptiste wrote: > Well, I can attest that pretty much every process that exits on my > machine generates these messages. But so far, my machine has run like a > rock with it - so for now I'm ignoring the logs and plowing ahead ;) I think that the rest of RML's post said that if you were getting > 0, then pre-empt was essentially not doing it's job. Safe, probably, but not actually doing anything. :) So plowing ahead is fine, but your machine might not be running the way you think it is. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS 1.1 and pre-emptible kernel???, Mike Baptiste |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS 1.1 and pre-emptible kernel???, utz lehmann |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS 1.1 and pre-emptible kernel???, Mike Baptiste |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS 1.1 and pre-emptible kernel???, utz lehmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |