| To: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | XFS (via CVS, last Thursday) and segfaulting on getfacl. |
| From: | "Ken D'Ambrosio" <kend@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Jul 2002 14:42:28 -0400 (EDT) |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <87adosq2un.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <87adosq2un.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Howdy, all. I got the latest and greatest XFS on Thursday, and just tried something that's got me a bit confused. I wanted to set ACLs on our Sales directory, recursively, so I did setfacl -m -R g:gSales:rwx Sales/ which spat back setfacl: Option -m: Invalid argument near character 1 So I then tried reversing "-m" and "-R", and it seemed to work. However, now when I try to getfacl, I get: [root@nebula shared]# getfacl Sales # file: Sales # owner: root # group: root Segmentation fault Any suggestions as to a) where I screwed up, and b) how to fix it? Thanks! -Ken |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS 1.1 and pre-emptible kernel???, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | sysctl tuning for XFS., Austin Gonyou |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS 1.1 and pre-emptible kernel???, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS (via CVS, last Thursday) and segfaulting on getfacl., Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |