| To: | rjmx@xxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS 1.1 and pre-emptible kernel??? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 15 Jul 2002 13:29:14 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <87adosq2un.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <87it3hhs1o.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1026751283.10198.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87adosq2un.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi Ron - On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 13:10, Ron Murray wrote: > At this point, almost any program I ran would exit with the > preempt_count error (I remember it happened with ls at least, but > others did the same. I forget which). If you want me to run some more > tests, I can probably do some tonight. Ah, ok. Well I guess it's fixed in CVS then, but not in XFS 1.1. I wasn't sure when the changes went in. So, if you want to use pre-empt, you'll need to use CVS or wait for our next release. Thanks, -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS 1.1 and pre-emptible kernel???, Ron Murray |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS (via CVS, last Thursday) and segfaulting on getfacl., Ken D'Ambrosio |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS 1.1 and pre-emptible kernel???, Ron Murray |
| Next by Thread: | XFS (via CVS, last Thursday) and segfaulting on getfacl., Ken D'Ambrosio |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |