Re: filesize after H/W fault

[ASANO Masahiro <masano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Eric,

> You say "linux-2.4.7 and xfs cvs based" - does that mean that it is 
> recent XFS code, ported back to 2.4.7?  Or is the xfs code from many
> months ago?

Some major issues and many minor changes had been back ported, but
not completely.
I could not change os version so easy by some reasons.

> There have been MANY changes in the area of syncing & logging since
> 2.4.7, so if you are running xfs code from the 2.4.7 days, I would
> strongly suggest an upgrade.  I don't have any specific suggestions
> on what may have gone wrong, but an upgrade would be a good idea.

Mmm, I agree, but...


Thanks Seth,

> He also didn't mention what hardware part was faulty.

A PCI related problem.
This PCI-box has been replaced already and it's fine now.

--
Masano