[Top] [All Lists]

Re: logdev on IDE

To: Keith Matthews <keith_m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: logdev on IDE
From: Charles Shannon Hendrix <csh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:55:10 -0400
In-reply-to: <20020727172200.0d9e5c54.keith_m@sweeney.demon.co.uk>
Organization: Big Endian
References: <1027535026.1648.5.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com> <20020727152441.GA9977@widomaker.com> <20020727172200.0d9e5c54.keith_m@sweeney.demon.co.uk>
Reply-to: shannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.4.1
On Saturday 27 July 2002 12:22 pm, Keith Matthews wrote:

> I understand that this was through a hole in the ATA spec that was
> closed about 6 months ago. I have no idea if there are any drives to
> the old spec still in the supply chain, but those currently being
> manufactured are probably OK.

That's interesting.  I had always heard it was pretty deliberate, and 
often driven by benchmarking tests.

This is good if true, though I still don't really like IDE drives.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>