xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Slight problem with XFS/Linux and Indy Drive

To: "'Seth Mos'" <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Slight problem with XFS/Linux and Indy Drive
From: "Zach Lowry" <zach@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 23:36:40 -0500
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20020623020124.0336de30@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: <zach@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> At 17:25 22-6-2002 -0500, Zach Lowry wrote:
> >         But, after checking out the archives, it seems that 
> I'm falling
> >victim to the page size restriction. Now, here are my questions:
> 
> The XFS CVS has support for the smaller then pagesize volumes 
> so I think 
> there is a chance it will work. The -current CVS is based on 
> 2.4.19-pre 
> which should have everything you need for this.
> 
> Asuming that the fs was formatted with a block size of <4K that is.
> 

Well, I got that built. Now, is there an option to pass to mount to
have it pick up the different block size?

Also, BTW, I get these messages in the kernel log. 

Starting XFS recovery on filesystem: sd(8,17) (dev: 8/17)
XFS: dirty log written in incompatible format - can't recover
XFS: log mount/recovery failed
XFS: log mount failed
XFS: unknown mount option [blocksize].

Thanks!

Zach

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBPRVQWIHWQmQc5olOEQLD1gCg8A0BdFxq3y/IDbFYy6EkmI1VMukAoOnl
VDQUhtk4+uXAQdH2zFrAYCsi
=+FHU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>