| To: | "Linux XFS Mailing List" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [OT] Compiling today's Samba for Debian fails with rejected patch |
| From: | "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Jun 2002 17:04:33 +0200 |
| Reply-to: | "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
# debian/rules binary [...] patching file `source/include/proto.h' Hunk #6 FAILED at 1079. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1522 (offset 1 line). Hunk #9 succeeded at 2441 (offset 4 lines). Hunk #11 succeeded at 2537 (offset 4 lines). Hunk #13 succeeded at 4759 (offset 17 lines). 1 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to source/include/proto.h.rej Is the Debian stuff possibly not up-to-date? I'd do the patch manually, but it seems far too much work, and I'm not sure whether I understand what the patch is trying to change. Thanks for any insights, Ralf -- Sign the EU petition against SPAM: L I N U X .~. http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ The Choice /V\ of a GNU /( )\ Generation ^^-^^ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS library could not be initialized, Ethan Benson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - make dmapi kernel<>library interface 64bit safe, Dean Roehrich |
| Previous by Thread: | Problem with linux-2.4.18 and freeswan-1.95, Ronny Egner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OT] Compiling today's Samba for Debian fails with rejected patch, Ethan Benson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |