| To: | Murthy Kambhampaty <Murthy.Kambhampaty@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: xfsdump and -v or -V? |
| From: | Matteo Centonza <matteo@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:27:09 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | "'Stephan Austermuehle'" <au@xxxxxxx>, "Linux-Xfs (E-mail)" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <E631530D51ABD411B823009027855C5B0278DF@THOR> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi, > Try "xfsrestore --help | more", which puts the version on the last line. For > some odd reason "xfsrestore --help" puts the version at the top of the help > screen but, "xfsrestore --help | more" puts it on the last line, obviating > the need to "look through the tons of lines generated with --help". Maybe > these SGI programmers are deceptively good at user interface design :), as > well as at engineering this really high-performance filesystem. > Murthy that's because the version number is sent to stderr (and the usage to stdout); Try this one: xfsrestore --help 2>/dev/null Ciao, -m |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: xfsdump and -v or -V?, Murthy Kambhampaty |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [linux-lvm] How well tested is the snapshot feature?, Dale Stephenson |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: xfsdump and -v or -V?, Murthy Kambhampaty |
| Next by Thread: | RE: xfsdump and -v or -V?, Paul Jackson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |