| To: | XFS list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Can I make my blocksize > 4k during mkfs.xfs? |
| From: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 4 Jun 2002 13:36:39 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <1023223347.25693.10.camel@lucy>; from fede2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 02:42:27PM -0600 |
| Mail-copies-to: | nobody |
| Mail-followup-to: | XFS list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1023218656.7905.19.camel@UberGeek> <1023218591.6937.52.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1023223347.25693.10.camel@lucy> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 02:42:27PM -0600, Alvaro Figueroa wrote: > > Only if you have hardware with a page size of 8K or greater, want > > to buy an ia64 box? > > sparc64 works quite well. > > BTW, what is needed, so that you guys can "offer" XFS as a stable > filesystem for some arquitecture other that ia(32|64)? the only thing in the ia64 patch is syscall entries iirc. other then syscall entries kdb is the only other somewhat non-portable peice of code, but its not really related to XFS. > (I specially want to know if there is anything I can do to help) the syscall issue should become irrelevant in 2.4.20 when Marcello is apparently going to merge the extended attributes API/syscalls. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: probs with cp -p, Ethan Benson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - fix make deps for xfs, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Can I make my blocksize > 4k during mkfs.xfs?, Alvaro Figueroa |
| Next by Thread: | blocksize > 4k...Belay my last., Austin Gonyou |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |