|To:||Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: XFS corruption!|
|From:||Libor Vanek <libor@xxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sat, 29 Jun 2002 00:57:05 +0200|
|Cc:||Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020611|
As the speed is not the problem (this is fileserver ONLY (no database etc.) and 100 Mbit/s is here the limit) I prefer ext3 because I still don't trust Reiser a lot (there still some "small" bugfixes...).
But what I wanted to say - do you have any numbers? Some Reiser/ext2/ext3/XFS comparison? Or it's just subjective meaning?
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|