Re: XFS corruption!

[Libor Vanek <libor@xxxxxxxx>]

> I'd recommend Reiser before EXT3. Reiser, I've found, is much quicker at
> most things than EXT3, unless you want to some benefits of journaling.
>  
As the speed is not the problem (this is fileserver ONLY (no database etc.) and 100 
Mbit/s is here the limit) I prefer ext3 because I still don't trust Reiser a lot (there 
still some "small" bugfixes...).

But what I wanted to say - do you have any numbers? Some Reiser/ext2/ext3/XFS 
comparison? Or it's just subjective meaning?

Libor