xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS and LSM

To: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS and LSM
From: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 20:17:08 +1000
Cc: linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:35:55 +0200." <4.3.2.7.2.20020613103328.03974d10@pop.arosa.nl>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 10:15 13-6-2002 +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
>I wanted to build a system running the XFS file system and Linux Security
>Modules (LSM), so I had a look at hacking the patch files to make them work.
>
>I found one issue where the patches severely conflict, system call 1217 on
>IA64 is sys_setxattr for XFS and is sys_security for LSM!

The *attr syscall numbers are official, in both Linus and Marcelo
kernels.  LSM is picking an arbitrary syscall number for testing so
they will have to find another number - and change user space to match.

Pity Linus did not take my patch that reserves a range of syscall
numbers for testing and provides a clean interface for determining
which number to use.  Linus does not consider this to be a problem.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>