On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 07:03:09AM -0500, Stephen Lord wrote:
> > The compiler is
> > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/specs
> > gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
> This is exactly the same compiler as appears to be the cause of
> the other problem. I wish we had the window narrowed down to less
> than 5 weeks, a LOT of things have changed in XFS in that interval.
I know that
#===== NOTE =====
# egcs-2.91.66 is the recommended compiler version for building XFS.
# Most of the XFS developers are using that particular version for
and I also know that a lot of people compile XFS with other versions of
the compiler. I do compile it with gcc-2.95.x for almost a year now.
Would it be a good idea to have a poll to get a feel of what the users
out here compile XFS with, and try to steer the main developers/testers
onto that direction? Or decide that gcc-3.1 is the "wave" of the future
and try to make it usable?
I know your first reaction will be "these are the resources we have"
and "contribute something before asking for something" but I am using
XFS since last summer and reported the occasional glitches I encountered
(not many, THANK YOU!). Also my load it fairly light - browsing, mail...
so it is not representative enough.
"NT is to UNIX what a dougnut is to a particle accelerator."
41A9 2BDE 8E11 F1C5 87A6 03EE 34B3 E075 3B90 DFE4
Description: PGP signature