| To: | Robert Sander <gurubert-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: config question (external raid, external log?) |
| From: | Charles Shannon Hendrix <shannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 May 2002 16:54:44 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <news2mail-slrnaf51ci.crn.gurubert-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <news2mail-slrnaf3t7i.c3t.gurubert-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020527182135.A27956@xxxxxxxxxx> <news2mail-slrnaf51ci.crn.gurubert-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.99i |
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 07:14:26PM +0000, Robert Sander wrote: > On Mon, 27 May 2002 16:36:24 +0000 (UTC), > utz lehmann <xfs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > A warning. All SCSI to IDE RAID Systems i know have non battery backuped > > cache. In the case of a power outage all unwritten data (and filesystem > > metadata) in the RAID cache is lost. This cause filesystem corruption. > > Running a journaled fs with a volatile cache is not recomended. I missed this article somehow. Is this caused by the cache on the IDE drives, or the interface conversion itself? If it's the drives, I believe that Seagate and IBM Ultrastar drives actually do honor commands to disable write-cache and other things that the generic IDE drives tend to ignore. -- UNIX/Perl/C/Pizza__________________________________shannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: config question (external raid, external log?), Ragnar Kjørstad |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: config question (external raid, external log?), utz lehmann |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: config question (external raid, external log?), Ragnar Kjørstad |
| Next by Thread: | Re: config question (external raid, external log?), Ragnar Kjørstad |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |